3 Comments

  1. Chad

    //It didn’t mean that our biology classes taught creationism and shunned evolution; rather, they encouraged us to examine issues and evidence and see the strengths and weaknesses of both views. It did not mean that our political science classes spoon-fed us right-wing polemics; //

    The idea that there are ‘two’ sides to what is otherwise the overwhelming consensus in virtually every academic field of scientific study.. IS .. a right wing polemic. Also, creationism is often nothing more than disparaging statements about science in general, having little to nothing to do with evolutionary biology. It’s one of those obvious truths wherein, if you give a creationist the benefit of the doubt that evolution is false, they really have no affirmative arguments for creationism BECAUSE all rhetoric in creationism is just misrepresentations of general science.

    • M. J. Young, Chaplain

      There actually are scientific evidences favoring Creationism. I am not a Creationist, but I am not a scientist, either, and I don’t attempt to evaluate the arguments rigorously.

      The idea that there are not two sides to every question is, I think, a left-wing polemic. In one sense you are right–one of C. S. Lewis’ characters (in That Hideous Strength) said (quoting loosely from memory) “There are thousands of sides until you know the truth, and then there’s never any more than one.” The questions are, which is the one, and how do we know when we’ve found it. I think for most of us in life, a bit of uncertainty is critical to critical thinking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *